Why should Christo write this text again on a sub-page describing a function? 'Multi Answering Auto Seq Protocol' is plain english, this term has never been used by the WSJT-X group.
#Jt65 webpage code
On the main page of MSHV is a detailed text where the code comes from, who are the authors etc. Function is different to Fox & Hound! I tried to compare it with any other WSJT-X documents, there is no equivalence. This is plain text, the terminoligy is standard technical terms. Why can someone claim it is 'stolen' ? Why does this author of 'what is said' insinuate Christo a criminal behavior by 'theft' ? I have I copy of the page and checked it carefully. Not think that the WSJT-X team are being unreasonable.ĭo not use development code when you have been asked not to.Ĭonrad PA5Y toggle quoted messageShow quoted textĬonrad, 'of what is beeing said' - I could not find it In the WSJT mailing list, so it must have been a 'private' echange and the statement is simply wrong. I bring this to the attention of the group because if itĬontinues there will be big troubles ahead. Nowhere on this page is there a mention of WSJT-X or On this page is stolen from WSJT-X, including even the To get an idea of how he has copied this stuff. 'We are currently developing FT8 DXpedition Mode. Here is an example of what is being said: I have found myself in the middle here butĬhristo is really not playing by the rules. This will ultimatelyĬause serious trouble. That reason but now it has been put back. Remove it by the WSJT-X development team. Is part of a development branch of WSJT-X and Christo was asked to It is also code that Christo does not have permission to use.